Skip to main content

Who Are We? (German)

The makers have been calling this as a four-part episodic film. Set in Vienna, it is a story about the rise and fall – and possible rise again – of two gay couples. Made at a shoe string budget, I am not sure if the film was needed to be split into 4 episodes with intro and end casting every single time, but her whatever. Also, the ending is a bit open. I feel there should be more, but maybe the point is to take the slice of life kinds deal and deal the story take its own course.

We meet two gay couples. Chris and David have ben together for a while. Chris wants to spice up relationship and suggests threesome. Reluctantly David agrees. David has his own start up company with his friend Ralph, while David is a freelance photographer, whose hobby is being sponsored by his rich parents. They find Lukas on a hook up and invite him over the next day. Turns out that Lukas is Ralph's boyfriend. But he is lazy, casual, doesn't work and pretty much living off his boyfriend who is reaching his limit of patience. In the threesome, clearly there is more chemistry between Chris and Lukas and David doesn't want to be part of it anymore. They both meet again next day for a photo shoot and when David finds out about this, he is very upset and accuses Chris of cheating and going behind his back. With feelings developing for Lukas and the urge to find his own success, Chris breaks up with David. Meanwhile, Lukas returns home and has an argument with Ralph. They are both super mad and Lukas just leaves him. Couple days later they meet again and there is obvious passion and they give in. That same night, David and Ralph go out for a drink, get wasted, come back home and end up in bed together. Only then David sees a picture of Ralph with Lukas and put two and two together and the film ends there. We don't know if he ever tells Ralph the truth or keep it a secret.

The film explores the topic of relationships as a gay couple and the constant change that comes with it. Every character experiences change on some level. Lukas needs change but is avoiding it, just by sitting idle at home. Ralph is trying to change Lukas, meanwhile he has been lying about his sexual orientation to his friend and work partner all this time. David hates the idea of change, be it wrk or relationship and is content with the boring monotonous love life. Chris needs change, spiced up life but because he is funded by his parents, never has to worry about money. As we know, they key to a successful relationship is communication and clearly that is missing in this film between the couples. What is not very clear to me as why is Ralph so passive and he takes mental abuse form Lukas. Lukas is hands down the most dislikable character. I don't think that was intention but somehow it comes across as a bad person using his boyfriend, his best friend and eventually Chris when he gets him a job. Probably made at a shoe string budget and shot primarily in three different apartments, the acting and direction are strictly ok. It is one of those pieces, where you can see the earnestness and honestly with which everyone is trying to do their part but the final product just doesn't come across together. Chris and David have absolutely no chemistry. Lukas just keeps making weird expressions and moves his eyes and head constantly. Ralph , is the worst. A cry baby, being bullied around (not in literal sense), he needs to be just shaken up a bit. The only person who has their act together is Lukas' female friend. I wish the film tried to tackle a larger question. If and when the relationships are not working, to what extent should you try to salvage it, or should you just give up? Here. It follows the latter path, but is that the right path? (5.5/10)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Shortest Distance is Round 3: Fallen Flowers

Continuing with the weird trilogy of "The Shortest Distance", I am so glad that finally I am done with part 3 and won't have to deal with this again in future. Thankfully, as of now the makers have not announced any further parts; which will save all of us on this earth from the embarrassment of watching this in near future. After the first 10 minutes are used in sort of recapping bits of first two parts, the story moves forward. Haruto is now starting to have feelings for Ruka, the mysterious pole dancer from second part. In a fit of rage, Ruka ends up killing the goat man and to save him and Haruto, Shibahara asks them to go underground. Meanwhile Shibahara continues the search for Seiya (the guy who had cut off Haruto's penis). It turns out Seiya is now also taking care of the original club owner from part 1. Both of them were released after they had informed Shibahara of Aoyama's secret location. Shibahara tortures Seiya's boyfriend leading to Seiya killin

One Summer Night (Korean)

I really wanted to like this film but for non native speakers, these movie leaves a lot to be understood and the way scenes were unfolding in front of me, I wasn't sure many times what was really going on. The story had potential button getting any back story on any of the characters limited my ability to empathize with any of these actors. Film starts with two North Korea military guys Yong Joon and Jae Sung having sex and they are caught red handed and they run. Three years later we see Yong Joon in Seoul leading a very mundane and poor life. He has a boyfriend Tae-Kyu, who is a weird guy. He is carefree, doesn't do any work and is completely emotional and financially dependent on Young Joon. In fact, even Yong Joon will go to any lengths to protect him , fend for him and taking care of him to the extent of even taking up prostitution. Suddenly one day Jae Sung appears in their life again. His motivation is not clear but it is obvious he wants Yong Joon back in his life, who

Ultimate masturbation: Shigoki no yama (Japanese) [The Ultimate Masturbation]

I would never know what was the point behind making this film. Was it supposed to be a comedy, cos it wasn't. It wasn't even porn. It was just a silly attempt at making something absolutely senseless and ridiculous. The story, as well as direction is equally shoddy. You could laugh for having seen something so bad, but I wouldn't call that comedy. An old man runs a camp about gay masturbation. The explanation given is that gays masturbate for pleasure unlike straight men, for whom the act is seen as shame or because they can't find a woman. One day a straight man shows up and wants to join the camp for his thesis. After discussion, he is allowed in. Rules include that you can masturbate together, you can masturbate one another, but there is no fellatio or anal sex. Some students of course breaks rule. The teacher then talks about 2 forms of masturbation which gives ultimate pleasure. He shows one without touching and then refuses to talk of the other. Somehow suddenly,