Skip to main content

Killing Patient Zero (Documentary)

Its been after a really long time that I enjoyed and liked a documentary like this one. Most times, documentaries become this very focused thing on one such subject, which I understand is the whole point of the thing, but to make it equally engaging and interesting is not easy. Based a book, this documentary is a compelling exploration of how a French Canadian flight attendant, Gaetan Dugas, came to be branded by the media as ‘Patient Zero’ and was widely blamed for bringing the HIV virus into the US. This documentary take an approach to clear his name, after his reputation was badly destroyed in Randy Shilts’ groundbreaking book 'And the Band Played On'. The film focuses on , if at all, the man should be celebrated for his continued support to CDC in helping, preventing and finding the causes and probable solution for the whole HIV/AIDS pandemic time.

The doc features plenty of folks and we get to see very personal portrait of Gaetan Dugas. It first starts with the whole cultural landscape in US, how being gay was not easy, eventually leading to riots of Stonewall and then the "gay virus" AIDS. Shifting to Dugas eventually, his friends, his colleagues and even some of his ex-lovers come on the screen to share their personal stories about the man. They all talk about his charm, his flamboyance, and most importantly how promiscuous he was. To tp that, his job as a flight attendant gave him the flexibility to travel everywhere and opportunities for multiple sexual hook-ups. We also get to hear from the CDC AIDS former Taskforce members about how they eventually connected the growing AIDS concern to Dugas who cooperated fully with the scientists investigating the epidemic, providing the names of his lovers, but refused to change his sexual behavior on the ground that no proof had yet been found that the disease was spreading by sexual contact. He was part of a “cluster study” tracing sexual contacts and labeled “Patient O,” meaning “Out of California.” But the O was mistaken for “Zero” at one point, giving the erroneous impression that Dugas was at the epicenter of the epidemic. We then get to see why Randy, a famous journalist at that point, decided to use this to sensationalize his book and how, according to him, that was the only way to get attention from the government officials to do something to fix the issue. 

Although Killing Patient Zero clearly sets out to clean up Dugas’ reputation, it also presents a complex portrait of a man whose behavior was self-destructive and dangerous. In the process, a scientist forcefully points out that the infection has a 10-year latency period and that Dugas is a scapegoat. The man known as “Patient Zero” himself died from AIDS in 1984 at age 31. As the film makes clear, he didn’t cause the epidemic, he was merely one of its victims. The interviewees of Killing Patient Zero share some wonderful and heartbreaking coming out stories and tales of finding relief in the ability to live without feeling like they’re hiding. There are open and candid discussions of sexuality including anal douche and bottoming. The documentary uses the traditional structure, combining talking head interviews with archive video, audio and photographs to impressive effect. But thankfully, in the process, it does end up , to a large extent, set Dugas free of the notorious references that he had attached to his name. (7/10)

Comments

luigi43 said…
A good opportunity to watch " And the band played on" . Happily in 80's my Companion and me were together already ...and were monogamously ! But we lost lots of friends!
Golu said…
oh wow! That must be a terrible time for you guys. I can't even imagine. But so happy that the two of you have been together for each other.

Popular posts from this blog

The Shortest Distance is Round 3: Fallen Flowers

Continuing with the weird trilogy of "The Shortest Distance", I am so glad that finally I am done with part 3 and won't have to deal with this again in future. Thankfully, as of now the makers have not announced any further parts; which will save all of us on this earth from the embarrassment of watching this in near future. After the first 10 minutes are used in sort of recapping bits of first two parts, the story moves forward. Haruto is now starting to have feelings for Ruka, the mysterious pole dancer from second part. In a fit of rage, Ruka ends up killing the goat man and to save him and Haruto, Shibahara asks them to go underground. Meanwhile Shibahara continues the search for Seiya (the guy who had cut off Haruto's penis). It turns out Seiya is now also taking care of the original club owner from part 1. Both of them were released after they had informed Shibahara of Aoyama's secret location. Shibahara tortures Seiya's boyfriend leading to Seiya killin

One Summer Night (Korean)

I really wanted to like this film but for non native speakers, these movie leaves a lot to be understood and the way scenes were unfolding in front of me, I wasn't sure many times what was really going on. The story had potential button getting any back story on any of the characters limited my ability to empathize with any of these actors. Film starts with two North Korea military guys Yong Joon and Jae Sung having sex and they are caught red handed and they run. Three years later we see Yong Joon in Seoul leading a very mundane and poor life. He has a boyfriend Tae-Kyu, who is a weird guy. He is carefree, doesn't do any work and is completely emotional and financially dependent on Young Joon. In fact, even Yong Joon will go to any lengths to protect him , fend for him and taking care of him to the extent of even taking up prostitution. Suddenly one day Jae Sung appears in their life again. His motivation is not clear but it is obvious he wants Yong Joon back in his life, who

Ultimate masturbation: Shigoki no yama (Japanese) [The Ultimate Masturbation]

I would never know what was the point behind making this film. Was it supposed to be a comedy, cos it wasn't. It wasn't even porn. It was just a silly attempt at making something absolutely senseless and ridiculous. The story, as well as direction is equally shoddy. You could laugh for having seen something so bad, but I wouldn't call that comedy. An old man runs a camp about gay masturbation. The explanation given is that gays masturbate for pleasure unlike straight men, for whom the act is seen as shame or because they can't find a woman. One day a straight man shows up and wants to join the camp for his thesis. After discussion, he is allowed in. Rules include that you can masturbate together, you can masturbate one another, but there is no fellatio or anal sex. Some students of course breaks rule. The teacher then talks about 2 forms of masturbation which gives ultimate pleasure. He shows one without touching and then refuses to talk of the other. Somehow suddenly,