This movie is a pretty wild "what if" story about Abraham Lincoln being gay and having a secret thing with his legal assistant, Elmer Ellsworth. It’s all told through the eyes of Taffeta, who is a Black, plus-sized queer person working behind the scenes. Taffeta uses this old history story to try and make sense of their own life and all the crappy treatment they deal with in the modern gay scene. Honestly, the whole thing feels a lot like a stage play, and it just wasn't as interesting as I hoped it would be. The story follows Taffeta, a stage manager for a small theater putting on a show about Lincoln. Every day is a drag because the audience ignores them and the actors treat them like a maid. Things get really awkward when Taffeta walks in on one of the male leads hooking up with a guy Taffeta had just seen on a dating app. To make it worse, the actor playing Lincoln actually tries to sexually assault Taffeta later on. After fighting him off, Taffeta goes out onto the e...
This is a film about unconventional people and their unconventional lives. The sequence, place and chronology is out of order and it keeps moving from present to multiple flashback sequences. The film is directed in a poetic sort of way, where sometimes not much is happening but as if you are witnessing a trio's life in front of you.
We meet Stephanie, a transsexual who has been reduced to turning tricks as a prostitute. The flashbacks show her as a young boy, Pierre. We also meet her Bisexual Russian boyfriend Mikhail and another male lover Jamel, who also is dealing with some family issues while working as a gay prostitute in Paris. As the story develops, we see Stephanie leaving Paris to care for her terminally ill mother, together with Mikhail and eventually joined by Jamel. The film shows us through multiple scenes how the trio come to meet, the events of their past, how Stephanie's relationship with her mother is finally being amended. There is no end or beginning, just a beautiful relationship of three people, with no jealousy, just love and its evolution over a period of time.
The narrative is conveyed largely through the experience of Stephanie, whose triangular relationship with the two men is one built on sincere and simple respect and equality. There is no question in the film of her having to choose between the two. All three are equally compatible with each other and do not have the usual conventional jealousies and arguments. They all need love and they find some with each other. While taking care of her mother, Stephanie tries to come to terms by confronting her past and making amends with her first love and slowly piece her life together. The transsexual depiction is done with the sincerity it deserves. Stéphanie (the actress is a transsexual in real life and has never acted before) is presented not as an oddity but as just a human being for whom life has dealt some challenges. I wasn't very clear with Mikhail's story but he did portray the lonely Russian immigrant very well. Jamel's issues are probably more to do with his line of work. The film may feel simple, but with beautiful photography is quite complicated at the same time. But having said that, the film is not for everyone.
It's an unconventional love story, with some very beautiful photography about love , sexuality, compassion about three marginally social outcast individuals. Many people will be frustrated with non linear narrative and not in your face start-middle and end. But I thought, for an independent film, it was actually not bad at all. (6/10)

Comments