This is one of those 2 actor film set in an apartment that could as well have been a play. This 1992 film and script solely relies on the dialogue heavy screenplay ad whether the two actors can really pull off the whole film on their own. Two young men Bryan and Brian meet at a bar, flirt and end up going to one of them's house for the night. Bryan gets on Brian's case for having given him a phony name earlier, thus setting off what amounts to an 87-minute, nonstop dialogue.
Brian is an open, if not practicing, gay man, while Bryan is a married bisexual who needs the security and respectability of married life while venturing out for the occasional tryst. The whiny Brian has to deal with their engaging in unsafe sex, and the weight of the possible consequences provokes a conversation with the usual issues of commitment and the nature of relationships. Their conversation is marked by its candor and exploratory precision as the topics range from poetry, dream analysis, philosophy and lost opportunities to AIDS, bisexuality, abortion and the politics of sexual position. They are alike yet dissimilar. They non-stop talk about why Bryan did not wear a condom and who does the responsibility lie with. Eventually, the film comes into its own as their defenses break down, and both talk about a hurtful relationship during their years in college-Bryan's with his freshman roommate, Brian's with a woman he got pregnant. There are hugs and tears, and each man tosses out a surprise revelation about his life. Once the conversations end, as expected, the man leaves the house in the morning. Together they were both alone.
One nightstand movies are not easy to make, and ever since I saw Weekend, I have realized that there hav been many more similar films, but they are not easy to execute and hold on to your audience's reactions. The two men are not bad at actors and do what they are asked of, they have good chemistry and are easy on the eyes, but somehow the situation as a whole doesn't do much. The film was probably made on a shoe-string budget and it shows. The topics discussed are relevant right from AIDS, how sex was free-er, the whole discussion on why one of them just didn't wear a condom, their past stories and all that. You feel good hearing all that for first 40 minutes , but then it just goes on and on and you just can't wait for it to end. Although there are merits to the topics that these two men discuss, the whole piece still seems more like a clever exercise than a real-life situation, and there's an artificiality to it all. Few years back, when it came out, I am sure it would have started many conversations around the subject; but as of today, it reduces to being more of a strictly average fair. (4/10)
Comments