I think the idea behind this movie was really interesting and different. It tells the story of a brutal attack on a gay man in Chile, which is a very serious subject, similar to the Matthew Shepard case in the US. However, it feels like the people who made the film weren't quite sure how to tell the story. The movie wanders around a lot, and many scenes are confusing because it's hard to tell what point the director is trying to make. The first part of the movie was actually quite good and I was excited to see where it went, but then it completely changes. It spends way too much time showing the dad being sad and frustrated, and the most annoying part is that the movie doesn't really have an ending or any answers. The story is about a teenager named Pablo who is around 17 or 18. He lives with his dad, Juan, who is a single father and always busy with work. Pablo loves to dance, hangs out with his best friend who is a lesbian, and is practicing for a drag show audition. When...
This film has a paper thing plot. The speed at which the film moves, tests your patience. I am really not sure what was the whole point behind making this film. This could easily have been trimmed into a 15–20 minutes short story and still the message could have been delivered, if there was any.
J and Jo are 2 guys who arrive at the top of a mountain wit full gear ready for hiking. We don't know the relationship yet, but soon through scattered conversations and Jo’s journal entries, we find that these two young men have spent the night together after meeting in a bar. Jo has agreed to follow J on an impromptu hike up the mountains, intrigued by such an unconventional and spontaneous approach to the awkward morning after casual sex. J is crippled by self-loathing because of an earlier relationship while Jo is overwhelmed with the need for true love. Soon they both start to wonder if there is anything at all that they liked in the other person. Their trip soon becomes a psychological battle of wills that can only find release in an act of violence.
Not sure if it was my mood, or what, but I struggled to keep my attention on this even at its quite short running time. I guess this may have to do with a lot of noting tats happening on the screen. Te boy just keep walking, wandering, playing stupid little wild games. I just couldn't connect. I kept questioning, what was the point of making the film. I understand at some point they wanna say that not every first attraction leads to happiness but we all know that. It takes time to know a person. The Norwegian mountains’ landscape is too grey and bleak to even enjoy. Maybe it's a representation of the boys' inner turmoil and the rising tension between them.
Either way, I feel the film was a sheer waste of time and effort. (2/10)

Comments