This Hindi movie is a pretty straightforward slice-of-life story that tries to give a modern look at what it's like to be a single, professional gay man. It dives into how he understands who he is, the chances he missed out on, and the personal choices he’s made along the way. The director used three parallel timelines to tell the story, which honestly didn't make much sense to me. While the core idea was actually pretty interesting, I really feel like this would have worked way better as a short film considering the point it was trying to make. Still, it wasn't a bad watch. The plot centers on Rachit, a city professional, and his friend Shikhar as they hang out for an evening. Rachit is a polished, urban guy, while Shikhar has more of a "small-town" rustic vibe, and you can really see the contrast between them when they talk. As the night goes on, Rachit starts thinking back to some old memories from a long time ago. He remembers being an intern after college in ...
I am not sure why this film was made. Featured in Cannes festival, I have too ay that when it comes to experimentation in movies, French are way ahead, but this film remains very much an oblique a non-needed film. Mostly delivered through VoiceOver by various characters, while we see multiple gardening scenes, this film is another great example of film makers taking vanity to another level.
Pierre-Joseph is a young man years old when he joins a training center to become a gardener. There he meets Françoise Brown, the director, Alberto, his botany teacher, and Adrien, his employer, all of whom are decisive in his apprenticeship and the discovery of his sexuality. At multiple given opportunities he hooks up with these older men a they are all sort of happy in a commune sorta situation. All this while we keep hearing of this India guy Kutta, born to a French mother, owner of this. Agriculture institute and how everyone is waiting for him. 40 years later, Kutta arrives and is now owner of a strange castle, who seems to be looking for something more than a simple gardener. Pierre-Joseph also has sex within but somehow next day, they both end up dead (or maybe not, who knows and who cares at this point).
A film about a botanists sexual awakening with older men had nothing going for it except beautiful gardening visuals if you are into that sort of thing. Slow pacing, story told through voice-overs and over-eroticized storylines, that test the audience’s patience. The film maker wants to focus on how the beauty of nature paves the way for a young botanist’s sexual awakening. While all of this sounds quite intriguing and serves potential for a poetic endeavor of passion and desire, it ends up as a slog and a half. The film starts with mention of Kutta who seems to be central to our storyline, who doesn't show up until last 10 minutes of the film, Instead the film suddenly goes into this voice over narration from the woman, to teacher, to student to whatever else was going on. All of Pierre-Joseph's sexual hookups with the older men are seen through highly confusing scenarios with some sketchy progress in the main character’s exploration of passion and affinity. You never know what exactly is going on. And you don’t really care to understand it all because nothing in the film is interesting. And what the fuck was the final scene when our guy has sex with Kutta who seems to hav multiple penises that wiggle around like an octopus' tentacles. The film gets weirder and weirder. Really!! I can't understand how and why people can watch shit and then appreciate it as if it is the best thing that has happened to art. At the end of it, I am not sure why this was made, what were they aiming for and what message was being tried to show. What a waste of time. (1/10)

Comments