This Hindi movie is a pretty straightforward slice-of-life story that tries to give a modern look at what it's like to be a single, professional gay man. It dives into how he understands who he is, the chances he missed out on, and the personal choices he’s made along the way. The director used three parallel timelines to tell the story, which honestly didn't make much sense to me. While the core idea was actually pretty interesting, I really feel like this would have worked way better as a short film considering the point it was trying to make. Still, it wasn't a bad watch. The plot centers on Rachit, a city professional, and his friend Shikhar as they hang out for an evening. Rachit is a polished, urban guy, while Shikhar has more of a "small-town" rustic vibe, and you can really see the contrast between them when they talk. As the night goes on, Rachit starts thinking back to some old memories from a long time ago. He remembers being an intern after college in ...
I watched this documentary completely not knowing anything on what its about. Actually I didn't even know that this was a documentary. It follows the conflicts that arise when gay white professionals move into a black working-class neighborhood. I am still not very sure if this needs to be reviewed here, but what the heck!
Focusing on the suburbs of Columbus, Ohio, there is a neighborhood called "Olde Towne". When economy hit hard in 80s until later, White Homosexual homebuyers were attracted to the neighborhood because of the cheap, beautiful, historical homes in the area. These new incoming residents in turn displaced older residents which primarily consisted of poorer African-Americans. The main focus is on two people. An older gentleman who is ordered by the city to take down a sign on his entrance. And then on an older lady, who has been summoned by the city for building code violations due to lack of maintenance. Also she is in no mood to sell her property. We do see the point of view of the gentrifiers who are sympathetic and want to care and nurture the history that these houses bring but at the same time, they are also looking to make money and profits out of all this.
This is a documentation of Gentrification; a war between low- and high- income parties. The sexual orientation has nothing to do with this, and race plays only a small part. I am not sure of this was a biased documentary but I felt that the gay community were shown off as uncaring and money-hungry.
Its hard for me to connect with either party in such scenarios and as such its hard for me to recommend this documentary or not. For me, based on entertainment or information quotient, I would still rank this pretty low. (2/10)
Focusing on the suburbs of Columbus, Ohio, there is a neighborhood called "Olde Towne". When economy hit hard in 80s until later, White Homosexual homebuyers were attracted to the neighborhood because of the cheap, beautiful, historical homes in the area. These new incoming residents in turn displaced older residents which primarily consisted of poorer African-Americans. The main focus is on two people. An older gentleman who is ordered by the city to take down a sign on his entrance. And then on an older lady, who has been summoned by the city for building code violations due to lack of maintenance. Also she is in no mood to sell her property. We do see the point of view of the gentrifiers who are sympathetic and want to care and nurture the history that these houses bring but at the same time, they are also looking to make money and profits out of all this.
This is a documentation of Gentrification; a war between low- and high- income parties. The sexual orientation has nothing to do with this, and race plays only a small part. I am not sure of this was a biased documentary but I felt that the gay community were shown off as uncaring and money-hungry.
Its hard for me to connect with either party in such scenarios and as such its hard for me to recommend this documentary or not. For me, based on entertainment or information quotient, I would still rank this pretty low. (2/10)

Comments